Edmund Hillary enjoying a snack on their return from the summit

Sir Edmund Hillary was the first man to reach Everest’s summit—but one missing everyday item suggests someone else beat him there by 29 years.


November 2, 2026 | Jesse Singer

Sir Edmund Hillary was the first man to reach Everest’s summit—but one missing everyday item suggests someone else beat him there by 29 years.


A Clue That Could Change The Story

Most of us learned that Sir Edmund Hillary was the first person to reach Mount Everest’s summit. But what most of us never knew was that, long before that famous ascent, another expedition made a run for the top. Decades later, searchers found one of the men who made that attempt. 

What they recovered was remarkable. But one missing photograph raised an amazing question that could change history.

Edmund Hillary enjoying a snack on their return from the summitKeystone, Getty Images

Advertisement

The Names Everyone Knows

On May 29, 1953, Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay reached Everest’s summit together. Their achievement became one of the most famous moments in exploration. They remain the first people confirmed to have reached the top. That word, “confirmed,” is where this story gets interesting.

Edmund Hillary and Tenzing NorgayDirk Pons, Wikimedia Commons, Enhanced

Advertisement

Someone Had Tried Long Before Them

On June 8, 1924, George Mallory and Andrew “Sandy” Irvine were climbing toward the same summit from the Tibetan side. Another expedition member saw them high on the mountain before clouds blocked his view. Neither returned, leaving one enormous question: How far had they actually gotten?

Andrew “Sandy” IrvineChristina Broom, Wikimedia Commons, Enhanced

Advertisement

Then Mallory Turned Up

For 75 years, that question came without Mallory himself to provide any clues. Then, on May 1, 1999, American climber Conrad Anker found his remains on Everest’s north face. The discovery offered a chance to examine what Mallory had carried on that final climb.

George MalloryWikimedia Commons, Enhanced

Advertisement

Even His Papers Had Survived

The search team recovered personal letters, expedition notes, goggles, and other belongings. Some fragile paper items had survived decades on the mountain. That mattered because researchers were looking for anything that could reveal what happened after the last sighting. One expected possession, however, was missing.

George MalloryZp at cs.wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons, Enhanced

Advertisement

A Promise About His Wife

According to a family account passed down by Mallory’s daughter Clare, he intended to leave a photograph of his wife, Ruth, on Everest’s summit. It would have been a personal gesture at the highest point on Earth. Suddenly, that family story had much bigger implications.

Ruth Turner MalloryUnknown authorUnknown author, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The Photograph Wasn’t There

No photograph of Ruth was found with Mallory. To people who believed he might have reached the summit, the explanation seemed almost irresistible: Perhaps it was missing because he had done exactly what he intended. Perhaps he had left it at the top before starting down.

View northward to Mount Everest from an aircraft from airline company Drukair in Bhutan. The aircraft is south of the mountains, directed north. Mount Everest is above the ridge connecting Nuptse and Lhotse.Mount_Everest_as_seen_from_Drukair2.jpg: shrimpo1967 derivative work: Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk), Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Why That Detail Matters

The photograph wasn’t supposedly destined for a campsite or some convenient lookout. The reported plan was to leave it on the summit itself. If Mallory carried it that morning and fulfilled that promise, he reached the top roughly 29 years before Hillary and Tenzing.

Mount Everest north face from Ronguk monastery in Tibet.Carsten.nebel, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

There’s One Obvious Problem

A missing photograph can’t tell us where it went. It could have been lost during the climb or the fall, or never carried on that particular attempt. The survival of other papers makes its absence intriguing, but it doesn’t turn that absence into proof.

Hiking mountainLloyd Smith, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Rewind To The Final Attempt

To judge the photograph fairly, you have to look at the climb around it. Mallory and Irvine set out from their high camp on June 8, 1924, using bottled oxygen. Their route followed the mountain’s northern side toward the northeast ridge and its difficult upper rock steps.

oxygen equipmentRoman Apaza, Pexels

Advertisement

Irvine Was More Than A Companion

Irvine was only 22 and had much less mountaineering experience than Mallory. But he brought something particularly useful: mechanical skill. He worked on the expedition’s oxygen equipment, which Mallory considered essential to their chances. Taking the younger climber therefore had a practical explanation, despite his limited experience.

Andrew ‘Sandy’ Irvine (1902-1924) during his college years at Oxford, circa 1920Unknown photographer, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Someone Saw Them Still Going Up

At approximately 12:50 p.m., expedition member Noel Odell caught sight of two figures through a break in the clouds. He described them as “going strong for the top.” It was an encouraging glimpse, but he didn’t watch them reach the summit. The clouds closed again.

Noel OdellArchives New Zealand from New Zealand, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Which Rock Step Did He See?

Odell’s sighting became one of the most argued-over details in the entire mystery. Researchers have debated whether he saw the pair at the First, Second, or Third Step. Those are different points on the ridge, and choosing the wrong one changes how close they were.

Focused woman working on a computer in a busy laboratory setting, showcasing teamwork and scientific research.Mikhail Nilov, Pexels

Advertisement

The Obstacle That Could Stop Them

The Second Step is the major technical obstacle on that ridge route. It includes a steep rock section at extreme altitude, where even simple movements require enormous effort. A ladder installed by Chinese climbers in 1975 helps modern climbers negotiate it. Mallory and Irvine had no such help.

white and black mountain under blue sky during daytimeJean Woloszczyk, Unsplash

Advertisement

Modern Climbers Put It To The Test

In 2007, Anker and British climber Leo Houlding climbed the Second Step after the ladder was temporarily removed. They used modern protection, but climbed the rock without the ladder’s assistance. That demonstrated a way past the obstacle. It didn’t establish that Mallory and Irvine managed it.

Conrad Anker AlpinistYellowstone National Park from Yellowstone NP, USA, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Their Oxygen Had Limits

Mallory and Irvine’s oxygen equipment offered a real advantage, but it was heavy and less reliable than modern systems. Their supply was also finite. Any reconstruction of a successful summit attempt has to explain how they handled the difficult climbing before their oxygen ran low.

Oxygen cylinders, 8, in pairs, in 4 wooden cases, German, probably 1st World War. Detail view, cylinders half out of one case. Graduated grey background.

Wellcome ImagesFæ, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

The Clock Was Another Problem

Even if they overcame the Second Step, the summit still lay ahead, followed by a long descent. Odell’s lunchtime sighting has therefore fueled arguments about their pace and remaining daylight. A successful climb would need to fit into a demanding schedule, with little room for delays.

a clock on a wallTibor Pinter, Unsplash

Advertisement

One Bottle Confirmed Part Of Their Route

A 1924 oxygen cylinder recovered below the First Step in 1999 provided physical evidence associated with their final attempt. It helped establish their progress along the upper route. But its location couldn’t show how much farther they continued, or whether they eventually stood on the summit.

Eric R. Simonson (2nd L), leader of a research team looking for evidence that two British climbers were the first to summit Mt. Everest, show an oxygen cylinder to the press in Kathmandu 25 May 1999. The oxygen cylinder is a relic from the 1924 Everest expedition of George Mallory and Andrew Irvine, who died on the 8,848 meter (29,028 feet) mountain. The search expedition recovered some gear belonging to Mallory and Irvine but failed to come up with proof that they were the first to summit Everest. AFP PHOTO/Devendra M. SINGHDEVENDRA M SINGH, Getty Images

Advertisement

Mallory Had Suffered A Fall

The examination of Mallory revealed a badly broken leg and deep rope marks around his waist. Those marks suggested he had been tied to Irvine and that the rope had caught a fall. They couldn’t establish whether the accident happened before or after a summit visit.

George Mallory, mountaineer who died whilst climbing Mount Everest. circa 1920.Mirrorpix, Getty Images

Advertisement

His Goggles Raised Another Question

Mallory’s snow goggles were found in his pocket. Some interpreted that as evidence he was climbing in fading light, perhaps descending after reaching the summit. But Anker raised another possibility: They might have been a spare pair. Even this apparently helpful clue came with an alternative explanation.

Snow goggles leather, used by Shackleton on the Nimrud expedition.

Wellcome Images
Keywords: Ernest Shackleton; artic; Exploration; eye wear.Fæ, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

There Was Another Missing Item

The photograph of Ruth wasn’t the only thing researchers wanted to find. Mallory had borrowed a small Kodak camera from expedition member Howard Somervell for the attempt. Unlike the family photograph, that camera might contain a direct record of where they went. It wasn’t found with Mallory.

Photographie d'un appareil photographique Kodak modèle B11 sur fond grisKoreller, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

Two Photographs, Two Different Questions

It’s easy to mix up these parts of the story. Ruth’s photograph was an existing picture Mallory reportedly intended to leave behind. The camera could have recorded new photographs during the climb. One offers a circumstantial clue. The other might contain an image showing them on the summit.

Scattered old black and white photographsFiona Murray-deGraaff, Unsplash

Advertisement

Could The Film Still Reveal Anything?

Kodak specialists consulted during the 1999 search outlined how recovered film might be handled and developed. Their advice included keeping it frozen until processing. That offered hope that images could be recovered, but it was a proposed procedure, not a promise that the film had survived.

black and white polka dot textileBarna Kovács, Unsplash

Advertisement

Why That Hope Has Faded

Later assessments were less encouraging. In 2024, experts discussing the mystery warned that repeated freezing, thawing, avalanches, and glacier movement could leave little recoverable information. Finding the camera would still be extraordinary. Finding readable photographs inside it would require another considerable piece of good fortune.

I took this picture on May 2006, on my way to Mount Everest base camp. Ilan Adler.Chagai at English Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

No Summit Picture Wouldn’t Settle It Either

Suppose the camera turned up without a usable summit photograph. That still wouldn’t prove the pair failed. They might not have taken one, the exposure could have failed, or the film could have deteriorated. A clear summit image could establish success; its absence would leave several possibilities.

Breathtaking view of Mount Everest with a clear blue sky backdrop, showcasing its snow-capped peak.INFINITY ADVENTURE NEPAL, Pexels

Advertisement

Then A New Discovery Emerged

In September 2024, a National Geographic team including Jimmy Chin found a boot containing partial remains on the Central Rongbuk Glacier. Inside was a sock labeled “A.C. Irvine.” Announced that October, the discovery was believed to be the first recovery of remains belonging to Mallory’s missing partner.

Screenshot from Edge of the Unknown with Jimmy Chin, National Geographic Channel  (2022)Screenshot from Edge of the Unknown with Jimmy Chin, National Geographic Channel (2022)

Advertisement

The Boot Didn’t Answer The Summit Question

The discovery gave researchers a new lead, but it didn’t come with a camera or a summit photograph. Glacial movement also complicates efforts to work backward from the location. An object found far below the ridge cannot, by itself, reveal the highest point its owner reached.

old leather boothamed falahi, Pexels

Advertisement

The Investigation Hasn’t Stopped

In 2026, Irvine’s great-niece Julie Summers and mountaineering historian Jochen Hemmleb revisited the expedition in “The Everest Mystery.” Their research examines the climbers’ abilities, the final attempt, and later discoveries. But it doesn’t announce a proven summit. More than a century later, the central question remains open.

a mountain range covered in snow at sunsetEugene Ga, Unsplash

Advertisement

What Would Change The History Books?

A clearly authenticated photograph placing Mallory or Irvine on the summit in 1924 could establish an earlier ascent. Hillary and Tenzing’s documented achievement would remain, including their successful return. But the answer to who first reached the top would change. That’s why the camera matters so much.

29 May 1953 Tenzing Norgay and Edmund Hillary after successfully completing the first ascent of Mount Everest at 11.30am.Jamling Tenzing Norgay, Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement

One Missing Picture Still Keeps Us Guessing

After the 1999 search, expedition leader Eric Simonson wrote that nothing recovered had “definitively proven the high point of Mallory and Irvine’s climb.” Ruth’s missing photograph leaves an intriguing possibility: Mallory fulfilled his promise, then never made it home to tell anyone. We still don’t know whether he did.

1921 Mount Everest Expedition, George Leigh Mallory. February 26, 1980.Fairfax Media Archives, Getty Images, Enhanced

Advertisement

You Might Also Like:

One Of The Earliest Known Alphabets Discovered In Syria

Evidence suggests that early humans were much smarter travelers than scientists once thought possible.

Sources:  1, 2, 3


READ MORE

St. George's Church

The Creepiest Abandoned Attractions

Despite their ominous origins, these abandoned attractions have become some of the world’s most popular tourist destinations.
October 7, 2026 Kaddy Gibson
internal

Four Tips For A Successful Vacation

Vacations are great but it’s also easy for them to turn stressful. Keep these travel tips in mind to get the most out of your next adventure.
November 2, 2026 Kaddy Gibson
internal

Five Must-Have Travel Accessories

If you're going on a trip, there are some things that you should pack with you every time. You can’t go wrong with these must-have travel accessories.
November 1, 2026 Kaddy Gibson
internal

The Most Visited Tourist Attractions In The World

The world is full of great tourist attractions, but have you ever been curious about which ones are the most popular? The list might surprise you.
September 20, 2026 Kaddy Gibson
internal

Welcome To America’s Strangest Tourist Attractions

Beware: this kind of sightseeing is not for the faint of heart. Check out three of the strangest tourist attractions in the country.
September 22, 2026 Kaddy Gibson
internal-vienna

Destination Of The Day: Vienna

With an abundance of beautiful architecture, fine art, and historical attractions it's easy to see why Vienna was once considered the capital of the world.
October 26, 2026 Kaddy Gibson


✕